How Are Final Goods And Services Valued When Measuring Nominal Gdp?

Market value of goods and services produced within a land

A map of world economies past size of GDP (nominal) in USD, World Bank, 2014.^[1]

Gross domestic product (GDP) is a monetary measure out of the market value of all the final goods and services produced in a specific time period by countries.^{[2] [3]} Gross domestic product (nominal) per capita does not, however, reflect differences in the cost of living and the aggrandizement rates of the countries; therefore, using a ground of GDP per capita at purchasing power parity (PPP) may be more than useful when comparing living standards between nations, while nominal Gross domestic product is more useful comparing national economies on the international market.^[4] Total Gdp tin can also be broken down into the contribution of each industry or sector of the economic system.^[5] The ratio of Gdp to the total population of the region is the per capita GDP and the aforementioned is called Mean Standard of Living.

GDP definitions are maintained by a number of national and international economic organizations. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) defines Gdp as "an aggregate measure of product equal to the sum of the gross values added of all resident and institutional units engaged in production and services (plus whatsoever taxes, and minus whatsoever subsidies, on products not included in the value of their outputs)".^[6] An IMF publication states that, "Gdp measures the monetary value of final goods and services—that are bought by the last user—produced in a country in a given flow of fourth dimension (say a quarter or a yr)."^[7]

Gdp is ofttimes used as a metric for international comparisons as well as a broad measure of economical progress. It is often considered to be the "earth'southward most powerful statistical indicator of national development and progress".^[8] Notwithstanding, critics of the growth imperative often argue that Gdp measures were never intended to mensurate progress, and leave out key other externalities, such as resource extraction, environmental impact and unpaid domestic work.^[nine] Critics often propose alternative economical models such as doughnut economic science which use other measures of success or alternative indicators such as the OECD's Better Life Alphabetize equally better approaches to measuring the effect of the economic system on human development and well being.

History [edit]

Quarterly gross domestic product

William Little came up with a bones concept of Gross domestic product to attack landlords against unfair taxation during warfare between the Dutch and the English between 1654 and 1676.^[ten] Charles Davenant developed the method further in 1695.^[xi] The mod concept of GDP was commencement developed past Simon Kuznets for a 1934 US Congress report, where he warned against its use equally a measure out of welfare (meet below under limitations and criticisms).^[12] Subsequently the Bretton Woods conference in 1944, GDP became the master tool for measuring a land's economy.^[13] At that time gross national product (GNP) was the preferred estimate, which differed from Gross domestic product in that information technology measured product by a land'southward citizens at home and away rather than its 'resident institutional units' (see OECD definition above). The switch from GNP to Gross domestic product in the United states of america was in 1991, trailing behind most other nations. The role that measurements of GDP played in World War II was crucial to the subsequent political credence of GDP values as indicators of national development and progress.^[fourteen] A crucial role was played here past the US Department of Commerce under Milton Gilbert where ideas from Kuznets were embedded into institutions.

The history of the concept of Gdp should exist distinguished from the history of changes in many ways of estimating it. The value added by firms is relatively easy to summate from their accounts, but the value added by the public sector, by financial industries, and past intangible nugget creation is more than complex. These activities are increasingly important in developed economies, and the international conventions governing their estimation and their inclusion or exclusion in GDP regularly change in an attempt to go on upwardly with industrial advances. In the words of ane bookish economist, "The actual number for GDP is, therefore, the production of a vast patchwork of statistics and a complicated set of processes carried out on the raw information to fit them to the conceptual framework."^[15]

Gross domestic product became truly global in 1993 when China officially adopted it equally its indicator of economical performance. Previously, Communist china had relied on a Marxist-inspired national accounting system.^[16]

Determining gross domestic product (Gdp) [edit]

An infographic explaining how Gdp is calculated in the U.k.

Gross domestic product can be determined in three means, all of which should, theoretically, requite the same consequence. They are the production (or output or value added) approach, the income approach, or the speculated expenditure approach. It is representative of the total output and income within an economy

The most straight of the three is the production approach, which sums the outputs of every class of enterprise to arrive at the total. The expenditure approach works on the principle that all of the product must exist bought past somebody, therefore the value of the full product must exist equal to people's total expenditures in buying things. The income arroyo works on the principle that the incomes of the productive factors ("producers", colloquially) must be equal to the value of their product, and determines GDP past finding the sum of all producers' incomes.^[17]

Production approach [edit]

As well known every bit the Value Added Approach, it calculates how much value is contributed at each stage of production.

This approach mirrors the OECD(Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development) definition given in a higher place.

1. Approximate the gross value of domestic output out of the many various economical activities;
2. Determine the intermediate consumption, i.eastward., the cost of material, supplies and services used to produce terminal goods or services.
3. Deduct intermediate consumption from gross value to obtain the gross value added.

Gross value added = gross value of output – value of intermediate consumption.

Value of output = value of the total sales of goods and services plus value of changes in the inventory.

The sum of the gross value added in the various economic activities is known as "Gdp at factor cost".

Gdp at cistron cost plus indirect taxes less subsidies on products = "GDP at producer price".

For measuring output of domestic production, economic activities (i.east. industries) are classified into various sectors. Later on classifying economic activities, the output of each sector is calculated by whatsoever of the following two methods:

1. By multiplying the output of each sector by their respective market place price and calculation them together
2. By collecting data on gross sales and inventories from the records of companies and adding them together

The value of output of all sectors is then added to get the gross value of output at factor cost. Subtracting each sector'southward intermediate consumption from gross output value gives the GVA (=GDP) at gene cost. Calculation indirect tax minus subsidies to GVA (GDP) at factor cost gives the "GVA (GDP) at producer prices".

Income approach [edit]

The 2d mode of estimating Gdp is to use "the sum of primary incomes distributed by resident producer units".^{[half dozen]}

If Gross domestic product is calculated this mode information technology is sometimes called gross domestic income (GDI), or GDP (I). GDI should provide the same corporeality as the expenditure method described afterward. By definition, GDI is equal to Gdp. In practice, nonetheless, measurement errors will brand the two figures slightly off when reported by national statistical agencies.

This method measures Gdp by calculation incomes that firms pay households for factors of production they rent - wages for labour, interest for uppercase, rent for land and profits for entrepreneurship.

The United states "National Income and Expenditure Accounts" split up incomes into five categories:

1. Wages, salaries, and supplementary labour income
2. Corporate profits
3. Interest and miscellaneous investment income
4. Farmers' incomes
5. Income from not-subcontract unincorporated businesses

These five income components sum to net domestic income at cistron cost.

Two adjustments must be made to get GDP:

1. Indirect taxes minus subsidies are added to get from factor price to market prices.
2. Depreciation (or capital consumption assart) is added to become from internet domestic production to gross domestic product.

Total income tin can be subdivided according to various schemes, leading to various formulae for Gross domestic product measured past the income approach. A common one is:

GDP = Compensation of employees COE + gross operating surplus GOS + gross mixed income GMI + taxes less subsidies on production and imports T_{P & M} – S_{P & Grand}

• Bounty of employees (COE) measures the total remuneration to employees for piece of work done. It includes wages and salaries, besides as employer contributions to social security and other such programs.
• Gross operating surplus (GOS) is the surplus due to owners of incorporated businesses. Often called profits, although simply a subset of total costs are subtracted from gross output to summate GOS.
• Gross mixed income (GMI) is the same measure equally GOS, just for unincorporated businesses. This often includes most small businesses.

The sum of COE, GOS and GMI is called total factor income; it is the income of all of the factors of production in social club. It measures the value of Gdp at cistron (basic) prices. The difference between bones prices and concluding prices (those used in the expenditure calculation) is the full taxes and subsidies that the authorities has levied or paid on that product. So adding taxes less subsidies on product and imports converts Gdp(I) at cistron toll to Gross domestic product(I) at final prices.

Full cistron income is likewise sometimes expressed as:

Total factor income = employee compensation + corporate profits + proprietor's income + rental income + cyberspace interest ^[18]

Expenditure approach [edit]

The 3rd mode to estimate Gdp is to calculate the sum of the terminal uses of goods and services (all uses except intermediate consumption) measured in purchasers' prices.^[6]

Market place appurtenances that are produced are purchased by someone. In the example where a good is produced and unsold, the standard accounting convention is that the producer has bought the expert from themselves. Therefore, measuring the total expenditure used to buy things is a way of measuring production. This is known as the expenditure method of calculating GDP.

Components of GDP by expenditure [edit]

U.S. Gross domestic product computed on the expenditure basis.

Gross domestic product (Y) is the sum of consumption (C), investment (I), government Expenditures (G) and net exports (X – Yard).

Y = C + I + Yard + (X − M)

Hither is a description of each Gross domestic product component:

• C (consumption) is normally the largest GDP component in the economy, consisting of private expenditures in the economy (household last consumption expenditure). These personal expenditures autumn under one of the post-obit categories: durable goods, nondurable appurtenances, and services. Examples include nutrient, rent, jewelry, gasoline, and medical expenses, only non the purchase of new housing.
• I (investment) includes, for instance, business investment in equipment, but does not include exchanges of existing assets. Examples include structure of a new mine, purchase of software, or purchase of machinery and equipment for a factory. Spending by households (not authorities) on new houses is likewise included in investment. In dissimilarity to its colloquial meaning, "investment" in GDP does not mean purchases of financial products. Buying fiscal products is classed as 'saving', as opposed to investment. This avoids double-counting: if one buys shares in a company, and the company uses the money received to buy plant, equipment, etc., the amount will be counted toward GDP when the company spends the money on those things; to also count it when one gives it to the company would exist to count two times an amount that merely corresponds to 1 group of products. Buying bonds or companies' disinterestedness shares is a swapping of deeds, a transfer of claims on hereafter production, not straight an expenditure on products; buying an existing building volition involve a positive investment past the buyer and a negative investment by the seller, netting to naught overall investment.
• Grand (government spending) is the sum of regime expenditures on final goods and services. It includes salaries of public servants, purchases of weapons for the military and whatsoever investment expenditure past a government. It does not include whatever transfer payments, such equally social security or unemployment benefits. Analyses outside the USA will frequently treat government investment as role of investment rather than government spending.
• X (exports) represents gross exports. GDP captures the amount a land produces, including appurtenances and services produced for other nations' consumption, therefore exports are added.
• Thou (imports) represents gross imports. Imports are subtracted since imported goods volition exist included in the terms Thousand, I, or C, and must be deducted to avoid counting foreign supply as domestic.

Note that C, I, and Chiliad are expenditures on final goods and services; expenditures on intermediate goods and services do non count. (Intermediate goods and services are those used by businesses to produce other goods and services within the accounting yr.^[19]) So for example if a car manufacturer buys machine parts, assembles the automobile and sells it, only the last car sold is counted towards the GDP. Meanwhile, if a person buys replacement car parts to install them on their automobile, those are counted towards the Gross domestic product.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Economical Analysis, which is responsible for calculating the national accounts in the U.s.a., "In general, the source data for the expenditures components are considered more reliable than those for the income components [see income method, to a higher place]."^[20]

GDP and GNI [edit]

Gdp tin can be contrasted with gross national product (GNP) or, as it is at present known, gross national income (GNI). The difference is that Gdp defines its scope according to location, while GNI defines its scope according to ownership. In a global context, world Gdp and earth GNI are, therefore, equivalent terms.

Gross domestic product is production produced within a country's borders; GNI is product produced by enterprises owned by a country's citizens. The ii would be the same if all of the productive enterprises in a country were owned by its own citizens, and those citizens did not ain productive enterprises in any other countries. In practise, however, foreign ownership makes Gdp and GNI non-identical. Production within a country's borders, merely past an enterprise owned by somebody outside the country, counts every bit part of its GDP but not its GNI; on the other paw, production by an enterprise located outside the country, merely owned past ane of its citizens, counts every bit part of its GNI but not its GDP.

For case, the GNI of the United states of america is the value of output produced by American-owned firms, regardless of where the firms are located. Similarly, if a country becomes increasingly in debt, and spends large amounts of income servicing this debt this volition be reflected in a decreased GNI but not a decreased Gross domestic product. Similarly, if a country sells off its resource to entities outside their country this will also be reflected over fourth dimension in decreased GNI, merely not decreased GDP. This would make the use of Gross domestic product more bonny for politicians in countries with increasing national debt and decreasing avails.

Gross national income (GNI) equals GDP plus income receipts from the rest of the world minus income payments to the residue of the world.^[21]

In 1991, the United States switched from using GNP to using Gross domestic product every bit its main measure of product.^[22] The relationship between U.s. Gross domestic product and GNP is shown in table 1.7.5 of the National Income and Product Accounts.^[23]

International standards [edit]

The international standard for measuring GDP is contained in the volume System of National Accounts (2008), which was prepared by representatives of the International Monetary Fund, European Union, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Evolution, Un and World Bank. The publication is normally referred to as SNA2008 to distinguish it from the previous edition published in 1993 (SNA93) or 1968 (called SNA68) ^[24]

SNA2008 provides a ready of rules and procedures for the measurement of national accounts. The standards are designed to be flexible, to allow for differences in local statistical needs and conditions.

National measurement [edit]

Countries by Gdp (PPP) per capita (Int$) in 2017 according to the International monetary fund

> $l,000   $35,000 - $l,000   $xx,000 - $35,000   $ten,000 - $20,000

$v,000 - $10,000   $two,000 - $5,000   < $2,000   No data

Countries past 2019 GDP (nominal) per capita^{[annotation i]}

> $60,000   $50,000 - $60,000   $40,000 - $50,000   $30,000 - $40,000

$20,000 - $30,000   $10,000 - $20,000   $five,000 - $10,000   $2,500 - $five,000

$1,000 - $2,500   $500 - $1,000   < $500   No information

U.South 2015 GDP computed on the income basis

Within each country Gdp is normally measured past a national government statistical agency, as private sector organizations commonly do not have admission to the data required (especially information on expenditure and product past governments).

Nominal Gross domestic product and adjustments to GDP [edit]

The raw GDP figure as given by the equations above is chosen the nominal, historical, or electric current, GDP. When one compares Gdp figures from one yr to another, it is desirable to compensate for changes in the value of money – for the effects of inflation or deflation. To make information technology more meaningful for twelvemonth-to-year comparisons, information technology may be multiplied by the ratio between the value of money in the yr the Gdp was measured and the value of money in a base of operations year.

For example, suppose a country's GDP in 1990 was $100 1000000 and its Gdp in 2000 was $300 1000000. Suppose besides that inflation had halved the value of its currency over that period. To meaningfully compare its GDP in 2000 to its Gdp in 1990, we could multiply the GDP in 2000 by one-half, to arrive relative to 1990 as a base year. The effect would exist that the Gross domestic product in 2000 equals $300 million × 1⁄2 = $150 million, in 1990 budgetary terms. We would see that the country'due south Gdp had realistically increased l percentage over that flow, not 200 percent, as it might appear from the raw GDP information. The GDP adjusted for changes in money value in this way is called the real, or constant, GDP.

The factor used to catechumen Gross domestic product from current to constant values in this way is called the Gdp deflator. Unlike consumer toll index, which measures aggrandizement or deflation in the price of household consumer goods, the Gdp deflator measures changes in the prices of all domestically produced goods and services in an economic system including investment appurtenances and government services, also as household consumption appurtenances.^[25]

Constant-Gross domestic product figures allow united states to calculate a GDP growth rate, which indicates how much a state'due south production has increased (or decreased, if the growth rate is negative) compared to the previous year.

Real Gdp growth rate for year n = (Real Gross domestic product in year n) − (Real GDP in year n − 1) / (Existent GDP in year north − 1)

Some other thing that it may be desirable to account for is population growth. If a state'south GDP doubled over a certain period, only its population tripled, the increase in Gdp may not mean that the standard of living increased for the country's residents; the average person in the state is producing less than they were before. Per-capita Gross domestic product is a measure to business relationship for population growth.

Cross-border comparing and purchasing power parity [edit]

The level of GDP in countries may be compared by converting their value in national currency according to either the electric current currency substitution charge per unit, or the purchasing ability parity exchange rate.

• Current currency substitution rate is the exchange rate at which one currency will be exchanged for another currency equally defined in the official international market.
• Purchasing power parity commutation rate is the substitution rate based on the purchasing power parity (PPP) of a currency relative to a selected standard (usually the United States dollar). This is a comparative (and theoretical) exchange charge per unit, the only way to direct realize this rate is to sell an unabridged CPI basket in ane country, catechumen the greenbacks at the currency market rate & and then rebuy that same basket of goods in the other land (with the converted greenbacks). Going from country to state, the distribution of prices within the basket will vary; typically, non-tradable purchases will swallow a greater proportion of the handbasket'southward total cost in the college Gdp country, per the Balassa–Samuelson result.

The ranking of countries may differ significantly based on which method is used.

• The current exchange charge per unit method converts the value of goods and services using global currency exchange rates. The method tin offering better indications of a country's international purchasing power. For case, if 10% of GDP is existence spent on ownership hi-tech strange artillery, the number of weapons purchased is entirely governed by current commutation rates, since arms are a traded product bought on the international market. There is no meaningful 'local' price distinct from the international toll for high applied science goods. The PPP method of GDP conversion is more relevant to non-traded goods and services. In the above instance if howdy-tech weapons are to be produced internally their amount will be governed by GDP (PPP) rather than nominal Gross domestic product.

There is a clear design of the purchasing power parity method decreasing the disparity in Gross domestic product betwixt loftier and depression income (GDP) countries, as compared to the electric current exchange rate method. This finding is called the Penn effect.

Standard of living and GDP: wealth distribution and externalities [edit]

Gross domestic product per capita is often used as an indicator of living standards.^[26]

The major advantage of GDP per capita as an indicator of standard of living is that it is measured frequently, widely, and consistently. It is measured often in that nigh countries provide information on Gdp on a quarterly basis, assuasive trends to be seen quickly. It is measured widely in that some mensurate of GDP is available for nigh every country in the earth, allowing inter-country comparisons. It is measured consistently in that the technical definition of Gdp is relatively consequent amidst countries.

Gdp does not include several factors that influence the standard of living. In particular, it fails to account for:

• Externalities – Economical growth may entail an increase in negative externalities that are not directly measured in Gdp.^{[27] [28]} Increased industrial output might grow Gross domestic product, only whatever pollution is not counted.^[29]
• Non-market transactions – GDP excludes activities that are not provided through the market place, such as household production, bartering of appurtenances and services, and volunteer or unpaid services.
• Not-monetary economy – Gdp omits economies where no money comes into play at all, resulting in inaccurate or abnormally low GDP figures. For example, in countries with major business transactions occurring informally, portions of local economy are not hands registered. Bartering may be more prominent than the use of coin, even extending to services.^[28]
• Quality improvements and inclusion of new products – by not fully adjusting for quality improvements and new products, Gdp understates true economical growth. For example, although computers today are less expensive and more powerful than computers from the by, GDP treats them as the same products by merely bookkeeping for the monetary value. The introduction of new products is also difficult to measure out accurately and is not reflected in GDP despite the fact that information technology may increase the standard of living. For example, even the richest person in 1900 could not buy standard products, such equally antibiotics and jail cell phones, that an boilerplate consumer tin can buy today, since such mod conveniences did not be then.
• Sustainability of growth – Gross domestic product is a measurement of economic historic activeness and is not necessarily a projection.
• Wealth distribution – Gdp does non account for variances in incomes of various demographic groups. Run across income inequality metrics for discussion of a variety of inequality-based economical measures.^[28]

Information technology tin can exist argued that Gross domestic product per capita as an indicator standard of living is correlated with these factors, capturing them indirectly.^{[26] [30]} Every bit a result, Gdp per capita as a standard of living is a connected usage considering most people take a fairly authentic idea of what it is and know information technology is tough to come up with quantitative measures for such constructs as happiness, quality of life, and well-being.^[26]

Limitations and criticisms [edit]

Limitations at introduction [edit]

Simon Kuznets, the economist who developed the first comprehensive fix of measures of national income, stated in his 2nd report to the United states Congress in 1937, in a section titled "Uses and Abuses of National Income Measurements":^[12]

The valuable capacity of the human mind to simplify a complex situation in a compact label becomes dangerous when not controlled in terms of definitely stated criteria. With quantitative measurements especially, the definiteness of the result suggests, frequently misleadingly, a precision and simplicity in the outlines of the object measured. Measurements of national income are subject to this type of illusion and resulting abuse, peculiarly since they deal with matters that are the heart of conflict of opposing social groups where the effectiveness of an statement is frequently contingent upon oversimplification. [...]

All these qualifications upon estimates of national income as an index of productivity are just every bit important when income measurements are interpreted from the point of view of economic welfare. Only in the latter case boosted difficulties will exist suggested to anyone who wants to penetrate below the surface of total figures and marketplace values. Economical welfare cannot be fairly measured unless the personal distribution of income is known. And no income measurement undertakes to judge the contrary side of income, that is, the intensity and unpleasantness of attempt going into the earning of income. The welfare of a nation can, therefore, scarcely be inferred from a measurement of national income equally defined above.

In 1962, Kuznets stated:^[31]

Distinctions must exist kept in mind between quantity and quality of growth, betwixt costs and returns, and betwixt the curt and long run. Goals for more than growth should specify more growth of what and for what.

Farther criticisms [edit]

Ever since the evolution of Gdp, multiple observers have pointed out limitations of using GDP as the overarching measure of economic and social progress. For example, many environmentalists debate that GDP is a poor measure out of social progress because it does non take into business relationship impairment to the environment.^{[32] [33]} Furthermore, the Gdp does not consider human wellness nor the educational aspect of a population.^[34] American pol Robert F. Kennedy criticized the GDP as a measure of "everything except that which makes life worthwhile". He connected to argue that it "does non allow for the health of our children, the quality of their didactics or the joy of their play." ^[35]

Although a high or ascension level of Gross domestic product is often associated with increased economic and social progress inside a country, a number of scholars have pointed out that this does not necessarily play out in many instances. For example, Jean Drèze and Amartya Sen have pointed out that an increase in GDP or in GDP growth does non necessarily lead to a college standard of living, especially in areas such every bit healthcare and education.^[36] Another of import area that does non necessarily improve along with Gdp is political liberty, which is near notable in China, where Gross domestic product growth is strong yet political liberties are heavily restricted.^[37]

Gdp does non business relationship for the distribution of income among the residents of a country, because GDP is merely an aggregate measure. An economy may be highly adult or growing speedily, but too contain a wide gap between the rich and the poor in a society. These inequalities often occur on the lines of race, ethnicity, gender, religion, or other minority status within countries.^{[ citation needed ]} This tin lead to misleading characterizations of economic well-being if the income distribution is heavily skewed toward the high end, as the poorer residents will not direct benefit from the overall level of wealth and income generated in their state. Even Gdp per capita measures may accept the same downside if inequality is loftier. For example, South Africa during apartheid ranked high in terms of Gdp per capita, but the benefits of this immense wealth and income were not shared equally amid the country.^{[ commendation needed ]} An inequality which the Un Sustainable Development Goal 10 amidst other global initiatives aims to address.^[38]

GDP does non take into business relationship the value of household and other unpaid piece of work. Some, including Martha Nussbaum, contend that this value should be included in measuring Gdp, equally household labor is largely a substitute for appurtenances and services that would otherwise exist purchased for value.^[39] Even nether conservative estimates, the value of unpaid labor in Australia has been calculated to be over fifty% of the country's Gross domestic product.^[xl] A later study analyzed this value in other countries, with results ranging from a low of nearly fifteen% in Canada (using bourgeois estimates) to high of virtually 70% in the United Kingdom (using more liberal estimates). For the United States, the value was estimated to be between about xx% on the depression end to almost 50% on the loftier terminate, depending on the methodology being used.^[41] Because many public policies are shaped by Gdp calculations and by the related field of national accounts,^[42] the non-inclusion of unpaid work in calculating Gross domestic product can create distortions in public policy, and some economists take advocated for changes in the way public policies are formed and implemented.^[43]

The UK'southward Natural Capital Committee highlighted the shortcomings of Gross domestic product in its advice to the United kingdom of great britain and northern ireland Government in 2013, pointing out that Gross domestic product "focuses on flows, not stocks. As a event, an economy can run down its assets yet, at the same time, record high levels of Gross domestic product growth, until a point is reached where the depleted assets human action as a check on future growth". They then went on to say that "it is apparent that the recorded Gdp growth rate overstates the sustainable growth rate. Broader measures of wellbeing and wealth are needed for this and in that location is a danger that short-term decisions based solely on what is currently measured by national accounts may evidence to be costly in the long-term".

It has been suggested that countries that have authoritarian governments, such every bit the People's Republic of China, and Russia, inflate their Gross domestic product figures.^[44]

Inquiry and development about the relation between Gross domestic product and use of Gdp and reality [edit]

Shown is how the global material footprint and global CO₂ emissions from fossil-fuel combustion and industrial processes inverse compared with global Gdp.^[45]

Instances of GDP measures have been considered numbers that are artificial constructs.^[46] In 2020 scientists, as role of a World Scientists' Warning to Humanity-associated series, warned that worldwide growth in affluence in terms of Gdp-metrics has increased resource utilise and pollutant emissions with affluent citizens of the earth – in terms of e.g. resource-intensive consumption – being responsible for most negative environmental impacts and central to a transition to safer, sustainable conditions. They summarised show, presented solution approaches and stated that far-reaching lifestyle changes need to complement technological advancements and that existing societies, economies and cultures incite consumption expansion and that the structural imperative for growth in competitive market economies inhibits societal alter.^{[47] [48] [45]} Sarah Arnold, Senior Economist at the New Economics Foundation (NEF) stated that "Gross domestic product includes activities that are detrimental to our economy and club in the long term, such every bit deforestation, strip mining, overfishing and and then on".^[49] The number of trees that are internet lost annually is estimated to be approximately ten billion.^{[50] [51]} The global boilerplate annual deforested state in the 2015–2020 demi-decade was x million hectares and the average almanac cyberspace forest area loss in the 2000–2010 decade 4.7 million hectares, co-ordinate to the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020.^[52] Co-ordinate to one study, depending on the level of wealth inequality, higher Gdp-growth can be associated with more deforestation.^[53] In 2019 "agriculture and agribusiness" deemed for 24 % of the Gdp of Brazil, where a large share of annual internet tropical wood loss occurred and is associated with sizable portions of this economic activity domain.^[54] The number of obese adults was approximately 600 million (12%) in 2015.^[55] In 2013 scientists reported that large improvements in health just pb to pocket-sized long-term increases in GDP per capita.^[56] Afterwards developing an abstract metric similar to Gdp, the Middle for Partnership Studies highlighted that Gross domestic product "and other metrics that reflect and perpetuate them" may not be useful for facilitating the production of products and provision of services that are useful – or comparatively more useful – to guild, and instead may "really encourage, rather than discourage, destructive activities".^{[57] [58]} Steve Cohen of the Earth Institute elucidated that while Gdp does not distinguish between different activities (or lifestyles), "all consumption behaviors are not created equal and exercise not have the same impact on environmental sustainability".^[59] Johan Rockström, manager of the Potsdam Institute for Climate Touch Research, noted that "it's hard to see if the current G.D.P.-based model of economic growth tin become hand-in-hand with rapid cutting of emissions", which nations have agreed to endeavour under the Paris Agreement in order to mitigate real-world impacts of climate change.^[lx] Some have pointed out that Gdp did non adapt to sociotechnical changes to give a more accurate picture of the mod economy and does not encapsulate the value of new activities such as delivering toll-free information and amusement on social media.^[61] In 2017 Diane Coyle explained that Gdp excludes much unpaid piece of work, writing that "many people contribute free digital work such equally writing open-source software that can substitute for marketed equivalents, and information technology clearly has great economical value despite a cost of zero", which constitutes a mutual criticism "of the reliance on GDP as the measure of economical success" especially after the emergence of the digital economy.^[62] Similarly GDP does non value or distinguish for environmental protection. A 2020 study found that "poor regions' GDP grows faster by attracting more polluting product after connection to Cathay's state highway system.^[63] GDP may not be a tool capable of recognizing how much natural majuscule agents of the economy are building or protecting.^{[64] [ boosted citation(south) needed ]}

Proposals to overcome Gross domestic product limitations [edit]

In response to these and other limitations of using GDP, alternative approaches accept emerged.

• In the 1980s, Amartya Sen and Martha Nussbaum adult the adequacy arroyo, which focuses on the functional capabilities enjoyed by people within a state, rather than the aggregate wealth held within a land. These capabilities consist of the functions that a person is able to achieve.^[65]
• In 1990 Mahbub ul Haq, a Pakistani Economist at the Un, introduced the Homo Development Index (HDI). The HDI is a blended index of life expectancy at birth, developed literacy rate and standard of living measured every bit a logarithmic function of Gross domestic product, adapted to purchasing power parity.
• In 1989, John B. Cobb and Herman Daly introduced Index of Sustainable Economic Welfare (ISEW) by taking into account various other factors such as consumption of nonrenewable resources and degradation of the environment. The new formula deducted from GDP (personal consumption + public non-defensive expenditures - private defensive expenditures + capital formation + services from domestic labour - costs of environmental degradation - depreciation of natural capital letter)
• In 2005, Med Jones, an American Economist, at the International Institute of Management, introduced the first secular Gross National Happiness Alphabetize a.k.a. Gross National Well-existence framework and Index to complement GDP economics with boosted vii dimensions, including environment, teaching, and authorities, piece of work, social and health (mental and physical) indicators. The proposal was inspired by the Male monarch of Bhutan's GNH philosophy.^{[66] [67] [68]}
• In 2009 the European Union released a communication titled GDP and beyond: Measuring progress in a changing globe ^[69] that identified five deportment to improve indicators of progress in ways that make them more responsive to the concerns of its citizens.
• In 2009 Professors Joseph Stiglitz, Amartya Sen, and Jean-Paul Fitoussi at the Committee on the Measurement of Economical Operation and Social Progress (CMEPSP), formed past French President, Nicolas Sarkozy published a proposal to overcome the limitation of GDP economics to expand the focus to well-being economics with a well-being framework consisting of wellness, environment, work, physical safety, economic safety, and political freedom.
• In 2008, the Centre for Bhutan Studies began publishing the Bhutan Gross National Happiness (GNH) Index, whose contributors to happiness include concrete, mental, and spiritual health; time residual; social and customs vitality; cultural vitality; education; living standards; expert governance; and ecological vitality.^[70]
• In 2013, the OECD Better Life Index was published by the OECD. The dimensions of the index included health, economic, workplace, income, jobs, housing, civic date, and life satisfaction.
• Since 2012, John Helliwell, Richard Layard and Jeffrey Sachs take edited an annual World Happiness Report which reports a national measure out of subjective well-existence, derived from a single survey question on satisfaction with life. Gdp explains some of the cross-national variation in life satisfaction, but more than of it is explained by other, social variables (Encounter 2013 World Happiness Report).
• In 2019, Serge Pierre Besanger published a "Gross domestic product three.0" proposal which combines an expanded GNI formula which he calls GNIX, with a Palma ratio and a set of environmental metrics based on the Daly Dominion.^[71]

Lists of countries by their Gdp [edit]

• Lists of countries past Gross domestic product
• Listing of countries by GDP (nominal), (per capita)
• List of continents by Gdp (nominal)
• List of countries by GDP (PPP), (per capita)
• Listing of countries by real Gross domestic product growth rate, (per capita)
• List of countries past GDP sector composition
• List of countries past past and projected Gdp (PPP), (per capita), (nominal), (per capita)

Run across besides [edit]

• Economic growth
• OECD Amend Life Index
• Chained volume series
• Circular menses of income
• Gross domestic product density
• Genuine progress indicator
• Gross regional domestic product
• Gross regional product
• Inventory investment
• Modified gross national income
• Listing of countries by average wage
• Disposable household and per capita income
• List of economic reports past U.Southward. government agencies
• Misery index (economics)
• National average salary
• Potential output
• Productivism
• Social Progress Alphabetize

Notes [edit]

1. ^ Based on the IMF data. If no data was available for a country from IMF, data from the World Bank is used

References [edit]

1. ^ "Gross domestic product (Official Substitution Charge per unit)" (PDF). World Depository financial institution. Retrieved 24 Baronial 2015.
2. ^ "Finance & Development". Finance & Evolution | F&D . Retrieved 23 February 2019.
3. ^ "Gross Domestic Product | U.Due south. Bureau of Economic Analysis (BEA)". www.bea.gov . Retrieved 23 Feb 2019.
4. ^ Hall, Mary. "What Is Purchasing Ability Parity (PPP)?". Investopedia . Retrieved 23 February 2019.
5. ^ Dawson, Graham (2006). Economics and Economic Alter. FT / Prentice Hall. p. 205. ISBN0-273-69351-4.
6. ^ ^{a b c} "OECD". Retrieved 14 August 2014.
7. ^ Callen, Tim. "Gross Domestic Product: An Economy'southward All". IMF. Retrieved 3 June 2016.
8. ^ Lepenies, Philipp (2016). The Power of a Single Number: A Political History of GDP. New York: Columbia University strategy-3-1-33252415-37392257_9257a4574cf75f9d33bf6a486ecb145d these measures affects in greater extent, the GDP will already exist drastically affected by the health crisis the earth is experiencing past COVID-19, which will reduce these expectations.
9. ^ Raworth, Kate (2017). Doughnut economics : vii ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London. ISBN978-one-84794-138-1. OCLC 974194745.
10. ^ "Petty impressive". The Economist. 21 December 2013. Retrieved 1 Baronial 2015.
11. ^ Coyle, Diane (six April 2014). "Warfare and the Invention of GDP". The Globalist . Retrieved 1 August 2015.
12. ^ ^{a b} Congress deputed Kuznets to create a system that would measure the nation's productivity in order to better understand how to tackle the Great Depression.Simon Kuznets, 1934. "National Income, 1929–1932". 73rd Usa Congress, 2d session, Senate document no. 124, page 5-7 Simon Kuznets, 1934. "National Income, 1929–1932". 73rd US Congress, 2d session, Senate document no. 124, page five-7 Simon Kuznets, 1934. "National Income, 1929–1932". 73rd US Congress, 2d session, Senate document no. 124, page five-7. https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/title/971
13. ^ Dickinson, Elizabeth. "Gdp: a brief history". ForeignPolicy.com. Retrieved 25 April 2012.
14. ^ Lepenies, Philipp (April 2016). The Power of a Single Number: A Political History of GDP. Columbia University Press. ISBN9780231541435.
15. ^ Coyle, Diane (2014). GDP: A Brief but Affectionate History. Princeton University Printing. p. 6. ISBN9780691156798.
16. ^ Heijster, Joan van; DeRock, Daniel (29 October 2020). "How GDP spread to Red china: the experimental diffusion of macroeconomic measurement". Review of International Political Economy: 1–23. doi:10.1080/09692290.2020.1835690. ISSN 0969-2290.
17. ^ World Banking concern, Statistical Manual >> National Accounts >> Gross domestic product–terminal output Archived sixteen April 2010 at the Wayback Machine, retrieved October 2009.
    "User's guide: Background information on Gross domestic product and GDP deflator". HM Treasury. Archived from the original on 2 March 2009.
    "Measuring the Economy: A Primer on GDP and the National Income and Product Accounts" (PDF). Bureau of Economic Analysis.
18. ^ United States Agency of Economic Assay, "A guide to the National Income and Product Accounts of the United States" (PDF). , folio 5; retrieved November 2009. Some other term, "concern current transfer payments", may exist added. Besides, the document indicates that the upper-case letter consumption adjustment (CCAdj) and the inventory valuation adjustment (IVA) are applied to the proprietor's income and corporate profits terms; and CCAdj is applied to rental income.
19. ^ Thayer Watkins, San José State University Department of Economics, "Gdp from the Transactions Table for an Economy", commentary to first table, " Transactions Table for an Economy". (Page retrieved Nov 2009.)
20. ^ Concepts and Methods of the United States National Income and Product Accounts, chap. two.
21. ^ Lequiller, François; Derek Blades (2006). Understanding National Accounts. OECD. p. 18. ISBN978-92-64-02566-0. To convert GDP into GNI, information technology is necessary to add the income received by resident units from abroad and deduct the income created by production in the country but transferred to units residing abroad.
22. ^ United States, Bureau of Economic Analysis, Glossary, "Gross domestic product" Archived 29 January 2018 at the Wayback Automobile. Retrieved November 2009.
23. ^ "U.S. Department of Commerce. Agency of Economic Assay". Bea.gov. 21 October 2009. Archived from the original on 21 July 2011. Retrieved 31 July 2010.
24. ^ "National Accounts". Fundamental Bureau of Statistics. Archived from the original on xvi April 2011. Retrieved 29 June 2011.
25. ^ HM Treasury, Background information on Gdp and Gross domestic product deflator
    Some of the complications involved in comparing national accounts from dissimilar years are explained in this World Depository financial institution certificate Archived 16 June 2010 at the Wayback Motorcar.
26. ^ ^{a b c} "How Do We Measure Standard of Living?" (PDF). The Federal Reserve Bank of Boston.
27. ^ Mankiw, N. One thousand.; Taylor, Chiliad. P. (2011). Economics (2nd, revised ed.). Andover: Cengage Learning. ISBN978-1-84480-870-0.
28. ^ ^{a b c} "Macroeconomics - Gross domestic product and Welfare". Retrieved 21 Feb 2015.
29. ^ Choi, Kwan. "Gross Domestic Product". Introduction to the Earth Economy.
30. ^ "How Real GDP per Capita Affects the Standard of Living". Study.com.
31. ^ Simon Kuznets. "How To Guess Quality". The New Republic, 20 Oct 1962
32. ^ van den Bergh, Jeroen (13 April 2010). "The Virtues of Ignoring GDP". The Broker.
33. ^ Gertner, Jon (thirteen May 2010). "The Rise and Fall of Thou.D.P.". New York Times Magazine. Archived from the original on 2022-01-02.
34. ^ "What Are the Advantages & Disadvantages of the Gdp in Macroeconomics?". Bizfluent . Retrieved 2021-05-07 .
35. ^ Suzuki, Dabid (February 28, 2014). "How the GDP Measures Everything 'Except That Which Makes Life Worthwhile'". EcoWatch . Retrieved May 5, 2021. {{cite web}}: CS1 maint: url-status (link)
36. ^ Drèze, Jean; Sen, Amartya (2013). An Uncertain Celebrity: India and its Contradictions. Princeton: Princeton University Printing. ISBN9781400848775.
37. ^ "China Country Report Freedom in the Earth 2012". freedomhouse.org. xix March 2012. Archived from the original on 17 May 2016. Retrieved 6 May 2016.
38. ^ "Goal ten targets". UNDP. Archived from the original on 27 November 2020. Retrieved 23 September 2020.
39. ^ Nussbaum, Martha C. (2013). Creating capabilities : the human development approach. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Belknap Press of Harvard Academy Press. ISBN978-0674072350.
40. ^ Blades, François; Lequiller, Derek (2006). Understanding national accounts (Reprint ed.). Paris: OECD. p. 112. ISBN978-92-64-02566-0.
41. ^ "Incorporating Estimates of Household Production of Non-Marketplace Services into International Comparisons of Textile Well-Being".
42. ^ Holcombe, Randall G. (2004). "National Income Accounting and Public Policy". Review of Austrian Economic science. 17 (4): 387–405. doi:ten.1023/B:RAEC.0000044638.48465.df. S2CID 30021697.
43. ^ "National Accounts: A Practical Introduction" (PDF).
44. ^ Ingraham, Christopher (xv May 2018). "Satellite data strongly suggests that China, Russia and other authoritarian countries are fudging their GDP reports". SFGate. San Francisco. Washington Post. Retrieved 16 May 2018.
45. ^ ^{a b} Thomas Wiedmann; Manfred Lenzen; Lorenz T. Keyßer; Julia Steinberger (nineteen June 2020). "Scientists' warning on affluence". Nature Communications. xi (1): 3107. Bibcode:2020NatCo..xi.3107W. doi:10.1038/s41467-020-16941-y. PMC7305220. PMID 32561753. Text and image were copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Eatables Attribution iv.0 International License.
46. ^ Pilling, David (4 July 2014). "Has Gdp outgrown its use?". www.ft.com . Retrieved 17 September 2020.
47. ^ "Affluence is killing the planet, warn scientists". phys.org . Retrieved 5 July 2020.
48. ^ "Overconsumption and growth economy key drivers of environmental crises". phys.org . Retrieved 5 July 2020.
49. ^ "Why Gross domestic product is no longer the most effective measure of economic success". www.worldfinance.com . Retrieved 17 September 2020.
50. ^ "World has iii trillion trees merely they're falling at alarming rate". Reuters. 2 September 2015. Retrieved 26 May 2020.
51. ^ Carrington, Damian (iv July 2019). "Afforestment 'has listen-blowing potential' to tackle climate crisis". The Guardian . Retrieved 26 May 2020.
52. ^ "Global Forest Resources Assessment 2020". world wide web.fao.org . Retrieved 26 May 2020.
53. ^ Koop, Gary; Tole, Lise (ane Oct 2001). "Deforestation, distribution and evolution". Global Environmental Change. xi (3): 193–202. doi:10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00057-i. ISSN 0959-3780. Retrieved 17 September 2020.
54. ^ Arruda, Daniel; Candido, Hugo K.; Fonseca, Rúbia (27 September 2019). "Amazon fires threaten Brazil'due south agribusiness". Science. 365 (6460): 1387. Bibcode:2019Sci...365.1387A. doi:10.1126/science.aaz2198. PMID 31604261. S2CID 203566011. Retrieved 17 September 2020.
55. ^ Afshin A, Forouzanfar MH, Reitsma MB, Sur P, Estep K, Lee A, Marczak L, Mokdad AH, Moradi-Lakeh M, Naghavi M, Salama JS, Vos T, Abate KH, Abbafati C, Ahmed MB, Al-Aly Z, Alkerwi A, Al-Raddadi R, Amare AT, Amberbir A, Amegah AK, Amini Eastward, Amrock SM, Anjana RM, Ärnlöv J, Asayesh H, Banerjee A, Barac A, Baye E, Bennett DA, Beyene As, Biadgilign S, Biryukov S, Bjertness Eastward, Boneya DJ, Campos-Nonato I, Carrero JJ, Cecilio P, Cercy Grand, Ciobanu LG, Cornaby L, Damtew SA, Dandona L, Dandona R, Dharmaratne SD, Duncan BB, Eshrati B, Esteghamati A, Feigin VL, Fernandes JC, Fürst T, Gebrehiwot TT, Gilt A, Gona PN, Goto A, Habtewold TD, Hadush KT, Hafezi-Nejad North, Hay SI, Horino M, Islami F, Kamal R, Kasaeian A, Katikireddi SV, Kengne AP, Kesavachandran CN, Khader YS, Khang YH, Khubchandani J, Kim D, Kim YJ, Kinfu Y, Kosen S, Ku T, Defo BK, Kumar GA, Larson HJ, Leinsalu M, Liang 10, Lim SS, Liu P, Lopez Advert, Lozano R, Majeed A, Malekzadeh R, Republic of malta DC, Mazidi Grand, McAlinden C, McGarvey ST, Mengistu DT, Mensah GA, Mensink GB, Mezgebe HB, Mirrakhimov EM, Mueller UO, Noubiap JJ, Obermeyer CM, Ogbo FA, Owolabi MO, Patton GC, Pourmalek F, Qorbani M, Rafay A, Rai RK, Ranabhat CL, Reinig North, Safiri S, Salomon JA, Sanabria JR, Santos IS, Sartorius B, Sawhney M, Schmidhuber J, Schutte AE, Schmidt MI, Sepanlou SG, Shamsizadeh Yard, Sheikhbahaei Due south, Shin MJ, Shiri R, Shiue I, Roba HS, Silva DA, Silverberg JI, Singh JA, Stranges S, Swaminathan S, Tabarés-Seisdedos R, Tadese F, Tedla BA, Tegegne BS, Terkawi Equally, Thakur JS, Tonelli M, Topor-Madry R, Tyrovolas South, Ukwaja KN, Uthman OA, Vaezghasemi M, Vasankari T, Vlassov VV, Vollset SE, Weiderpass East, Werdecker A, Wesana J, Westerman R, Yano Y, Yonemoto N, Yonga One thousand, Zaidi Z, Zenebe ZM, Zipkin B, Murray CJ (July 2017). "Health Effects of Overweight and Obesity in 195 Countries over 25 Years". The New England Journal of Medicine. 377 (1): 13–27. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1614362. PMC5477817. PMID 28604169.
56. ^ Ashraf, Quamrul H.; Lester, Ashley; Weil, David N. (2009). "When Does Improving Health Raise GDP?". NBER Macroeconomics Annual. 23: 157–204. doi:10.1086/593084. ISSN 0889-3365. PMC3860117. PMID 24347816.
57. ^ "Social Wealth Index". The Center for Partnership Studies . Retrieved 17 September 2020.
58. ^ Gansbeke, Frank Van. "Climate Modify And Gdp – Need For A Drastic Overhaul". Forbes . Retrieved 17 September 2020.
59. ^ "Economic growth and ecology sustainability". phys.org . Retrieved 20 September 2020.
60. ^ Landler, Marking; Sengupta, Somini (21 January 2020). "Trump and the Teenager: A Climate Showdown at Davos". The New York Times . Retrieved 20 September 2020.
61. ^ Kapoor, Amit; Debroy, Bibek (4 October 2019). "Gdp Is Not a Measure of Human being Well-Being". Harvard Business Review . Retrieved 20 September 2020.
62. ^ "Rethinking Gross domestic product -- Finance & Development, March 2017". world wide web.imf.org . Retrieved 20 September 2020.
63. ^ He, Guojun; Xie, Yang; Zhang, Bing (one June 2020). "Expressways, Gdp, and the environment: The case of Cathay". Journal of Development Economics. 145: 102485. doi:10.1016/j.jdeveco.2020.102485. ISSN 0304-3878. S2CID 203596268. Retrieved 20 September 2020.
64. ^ "GDP is destroying the planet. Here'due south an alternative". World Economic Forum . Retrieved xx September 2020.
65. ^ Shahani, Severine Deneulin; Lila (2009). An Introduction to the Human Development and Adequacy : Approach (1st ed.). London: Earthscan Ltd. ISBN9781844078066.
66. ^ "Gross National Happiness (GNH) - A New Socioeconomic Development Policy Framework - A Policy White Paper - The American Pursuit of Unhappiness - Med Jones, IIM". Iim-edu.org. 10 January 2005.
67. ^ "Happiness Ministry in Dubai". 11 February 2016.
68. ^ "Harvard Kennedy Schoolhouse Study to Usa Congressman 21st Century GDP: National Indicators for a New Era" (PDF).
69. ^ "Gross domestic product and beyond: Measuring progress in a irresolute world". European Marriage. 2009. Retrieved 26 February 2012.
70. ^ "Bhutan GNH Index"
71. ^ "Death by GDP - how the climate crunch is driven by a growth yardstick". The Straits Times. 21 December 2019.

Farther reading [edit]

• Australian Bureau for Statistics, Australian National Accounts: Concepts, Sources and Methods, 2000. Retrieved November 2009. In depth explanations of how GDP and other national accounts items are determined.
• Coyle, Diane (2014). GDP: A Brief but Appreciating History. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Academy Press. ISBN978-0-691-15679-8.
• Joseph Due east. Stiglitz, "Measuring What Matters: Obsession with one financial figure, Gross domestic product, has worsened people's health, happiness and the environment, and economists want to supplant information technology", Scientific American, vol. 323, no. 2 (Baronial 2020), pp. 24–31.
• United States Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis, "Concepts and Methods of the U.s.a. National Income and Production Accounts" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 8 November 2017. Retrieved 9 March 2018. . Retrieved November 2009. In depth explanations of how Gdp and other national accounts items are determined.

External links [edit]

Global

• Australian Agency of Statistics Manual on Gdp measurement
• GDP-indexed bonds
• OECD Gdp chart
• Un Statistical Databases
• World Evolution Indicators (WDI) at Worldbank.org
• World Gdp Chart (since 1960)

Data

• Bureau of Economic Analysis: Official United states of america GDP information
• Historicalstatistics.org: Links to historical statistics on Gross domestic product for countries and regions, maintained by the Section of Economical History at Stockholm Academy.
• Quandl - Gdp by country - downloadable in CSV, Excel, JSON or XML
• Historical US Gdp (yearly data), 1790–present, maintained by Samuel H. Williamson and Lawrence H. Officer, both professors of economics at the University of Illinois at Chicago.
• Google – public data: GDP and Personal Income of the U.S. (annual): Nominal Gross Domestic Production
• The Maddison Projection of the Groningen Growth and Development Heart at the University of Groningen, the Netherlands. This project continues and extends the work of Angus Maddison in collating all the available, credible data estimating GDP for countries around the world. This includes data for some countries for over 2,000 years dorsum to ane CE and for substantially all countries since 1950.

Articles and books

• Gross Domestic Product: An Economy'due south All, International Monetary Fund.
• Stiglitz JE, Sen A, Fitoussi J-P. Mismeasuring our Lives: Why Gdp Doesn't Add Up, New Printing, New York, 2010
• What's incorrect with the Gdp?
• Whether output and CPI aggrandizement are mismeasured, by Nouriel Roubini and David Backus, in Lectures in Macroeconomics
• Rodney Edvinsson, Edvinsson, Rodney (2005). "Growth, Accumulation, Crisis: With New Macroeconomic Data for Sweden 1800–2000". Diva.
• Clifford Cobb, Ted Halstead and Jonathan Rowe. "If the Gross domestic product is upward, why is America downward?" The Atlantic Monthly, vol. 276, no. 4, Oct 1995, pages 59–78
• Jerorn C.J.M. van den Bergh, "Abolishing Gross domestic product"
• GDP and GNI in OECD Observer No246-247, Dec 2004-Jan 2005

How Are Final Goods And Services Valued When Measuring Nominal Gdp?,

Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gross_domestic_product

Posted by: cainthournes.blogspot.com

Share this post